How to Save a Constitutional Democracy

How to Save a Constitutional Democracy
Author :
Publisher : University of Chicago Press
Total Pages : 306
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780226564388
ISBN-13 : 022656438X
Rating : 4/5 (88 Downloads)

Book Synopsis How to Save a Constitutional Democracy by : Tom Ginsburg

Download or read book How to Save a Constitutional Democracy written by Tom Ginsburg and published by University of Chicago Press. This book was released on 2018-10-05 with total page 306 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Democracies are in danger. Around the world, a rising wave of populist leaders threatens to erode the core structures of democratic self-rule. In the United States, the tenure of Donald Trump has seemed decisive turning point for many. What kind of president intimidates jurors, calls the news media the “enemy of the American people,” and seeks foreign assistance investigating domestic political rivals? Whatever one thinks of President Trump, many think the Constitution will safeguard us from lasting damage. But is that assumption justified? How to Save a Constitutional Democracy mounts an urgent argument that we can no longer afford to be complacent. Drawing on a rich array of other countries’ experiences with democratic backsliding, Tom Ginsburg and Aziz Z. Huq show how constitutional rules can both hinder and hasten the decline of democratic institutions. The checks and balances of the federal government, a robust civil society and media, and individual rights—such as those enshrined in the First Amendment—often fail as bulwarks against democratic decline. The sobering reality for the United States, Ginsburg and Huq contend, is that the Constitution’s design makes democratic erosion more, not less, likely. Its structural rigidity has had unforeseen consequence—leaving the presidency weakly regulated and empowering the Supreme Court conjure up doctrines that ultimately facilitate rather than inhibit rights violations. Even the bright spots in the Constitution—the First Amendment, for example—may have perverse consequences in the hands of a deft communicator who can degrade the public sphere by wielding hateful language banned in many other democracies. We—and the rest of the world—can do better. The authors conclude by laying out practical steps for how laws and constitutional design can play a more positive role in managing the risk of democratic decline.


How to Save a Constitutional Democracy Related Books

How to Save a Constitutional Democracy
Language: en
Pages: 306
Authors: Tom Ginsburg
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-10-05 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Democracies are in danger. Around the world, a rising wave of populist leaders threatens to erode the core structures of democratic self-rule. In the United Sta
Encyclopedia of Global Justice
Language: en
Pages:
Authors: Deen K. Chatterjee
Categories: Electronic books
Type: BOOK - Published: 2011 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Encyclopedia is an international, interdisciplinary, and collaborative project, spanning all the relevant areas of scholarship related to issues of global j
Active Liberty
Language: en
Pages: 176
Authors: Stephen Breyer
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2007-12-18 - Publisher: Vintage

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.For Justice Breyer, the Constitution’s pr
Militant Democracy
Language: en
Pages: 271
Authors: András Sajó
Categories: Civil rights
Type: BOOK - Published: 2004 - Publisher: Eleven International Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book is a collection of contributions by leading scholars on theoretical and contemporary problems of militant democracy. The term 'militant democracy' was
The Constitution of Equality
Language: en
Pages: 320
Authors: Thomas Christiano
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-06-10 - Publisher: OUP Oxford

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

What is the ethical basis of democracy? And what reasons do we have to go along with democratic decisions even when we disagree with them? And when do we have r