Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement

Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 746
Release :
ISBN-10 : OCLC:650826842
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (42 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement by :

Download or read book Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement written by and published by . This book was released on 2010 with total page 746 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Pursuant to the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-414), DOE has been directed to designate a facility or facilities for the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury generated within the United States. DOE is analyzing the storage of up to 10,000 metric tons (11,000 tons) of elemental mercury in a facility(ies) constructed and operated in accordance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (74 FR 31723). DOE has prepared this Mercury Storage EIS in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) implementing regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508), and DOE's NEPA implementing procedures (10 CFR 1021) to evaluate the reasonable alternatives for a facility(ies) for the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury. This Mercury Storage EIS analyzes the potential environmental, human health, and socioeconomic impacts of elemental mercury storage at seven candidate locations: Grand Junction Disposal Site near Grand Junction, Colorado; Hanford Site near Richland, Washington; Hawthorne Army Depot near Hawthorne, Nevada; Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho; Kansas City Plant in Kansas City, Missouri; Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina; and Waste Control Specialists, LLC, near Andrews, Texas. As required by CEQ NEPA regulations, the No Action Alternative is also analyzed as a basis for comparison. DOE intends to decide (1) where to locate the elemental mercury storage facility(ies) and (2) whether to use existing buildings, new buildings, or a combination of existing and new buildings. DOE's Preferred Alternative is storage in a combination of an existing facility and a new facility at Waste Control Specialists, LLC, near Andrews, Texas.


Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement Related Books

Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury
Language: en
Pages: 798
Authors:
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2011 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement
Language: en
Pages: 746
Authors:
Categories: Environmental impact statements
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Pursuant to the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-414), DOE has been directed to designate a facility or facilities for the long-term management and stor
Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
Language: en
Pages: 424
Authors: United States. Department of Energy. Office of Environmental Management
Categories: Environmental impact statements
Type: BOOK - Published: 2013 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement
Language: en
Pages:
Authors: United States. Department of Energy
Categories: Environmental impact statements
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Draft Long-term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
Language: en
Pages: 0