The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators

The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators
Author :
Publisher : MIT Press
Total Pages : 0
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780262529525
ISBN-13 : 0262529521
Rating : 4/5 (25 Downloads)

Book Synopsis The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators by : Andrei Shleifer

Download or read book The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators written by Andrei Shleifer and published by MIT Press. This book was released on 2016-03-25 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: A noted economist argues that the ubiquity of regulation can be explained by its greater efficiency when compared to litigation. Government regulation is ubiquitous today in rich and middle-income countries—present in areas that range from workplace conditions to food processing to school curricula—although standard economic theories predict that it should be rather uncommon. In this book, Andrei Shleifer argues that the ubiquity of regulation can be explained not so much by the failure of markets as by the failure of courts to solve contract and tort disputes cheaply, predictably, and impartially. When courts are expensive, unpredictable, and biased, the public will seek alternatives to dispute resolution. The form this alternative has taken throughout the world is regulation. The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators gathers Shleifer's influential writings on regulation and adds to them a substantial introductory essay in which Shleifer critiques the standard theories of economic regulation and proposes “the Enforcement Theory of Regulation,” which sees regulation as the more efficient strategy for social control of business. Subsequent chapters present the theoretical and empirical case against the efficiency of courts, make the historical and theoretical case for the comparative efficiency of regulation, and offer two empirical studies suggesting circumstances in which regulation might emerge as an efficient solution to social problems. Shleifer does not offer an unconditional endorsement of regulation and its expansion but rather argues that it is better than its alternatives, particularly litigation. Contributors Nicola Gennaioli, Anthony Niblett, Richard A. Posner, Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Edward L. Glaeser, Simon Johnson, Casey B. Mulligan


The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators Related Books

The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators
Language: en
Pages: 0
Authors: Andrei Shleifer
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-03-25 - Publisher: MIT Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A noted economist argues that the ubiquity of regulation can be explained by its greater efficiency when compared to litigation. Government regulation is ubiqui
Regulation Versus Litigation
Language: en
Pages: 344
Authors: Daniel P. Kessler
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2011-02 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The efficacy of various political institutions is the subject of intense debate between proponents of broad legislative standards enforced through litigation an
Judging Regulators
Language: en
Pages: 183
Authors: Eric C. Ip
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2020-10-30 - Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Drawing insights from economics and political science, Judging Regulators explains why the administrative law of the US and the UK has radically diverged from e
The Conservative Case for Class Actions
Language: en
Pages: 282
Authors: Brian T. Fitzpatrick
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2022-02-19 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Since the 1960s, the class action lawsuit has been a powerful tool for holding businesses accountable. Yet years of attacks by corporate America and unfavorable
University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 80, Number 4 - Fall 2013
Language: en
Pages: 604
Authors: University of Chicago Law Review
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2014-01-02 - Publisher: Quid Pro Books

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This fourth issue of 2013 features articles from internationally recognized legal scholars, and extensive research in Comments authored by University of Chicago