Journal of the Institute of Asian Studies

Journal of the Institute of Asian Studies
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 372
Release :
ISBN-10 : UOM:39015048638228
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (28 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Journal of the Institute of Asian Studies by :

Download or read book Journal of the Institute of Asian Studies written by and published by . This book was released on 1997 with total page 372 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


Journal of the Institute of Asian Studies Related Books

Journal of the Institute of Asian Studies
Language: en
Pages: 372
Authors:
Categories: Asia
Type: BOOK - Published: 1997 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Pure and True
Language: en
Pages: 261
Authors: David R. Stroup
Categories: Social Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2022-02-23 - Publisher: University of Washington Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Chinese Communist Party points to the Hui—China’s largest Muslim ethnic group—as a model ethnic minority and touts its harmonious relations with the g
Sovereignty and Status in East Asian International Relations
Language: en
Pages: 223
Authors: Seo-Hyun Park
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-05-11 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book provides a theoretical and empirical analysis of a key concept in East Asian security debates, sovereign autonomy, and how it reproduces hierarchy in
The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia
Language: en
Pages: 324
Authors: Nicholas Tarling
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 1999 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This history covers mainland and island Southeast Asia from Burma to Indonesia. Volume I is from prehistory to c1500. Volume II discusses the area's interaction
Prioritarianism in Practice
Language: en
Pages: 687
Authors: Matthew D. Adler
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2022-04-21 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Prioritarianism is an ethical theory that gives extra weight to the well-being of the worse off. In contrast, dominant policy-evaluation methodologies, such as