The Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China

The Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China
Author :
Publisher : Better English Language Teaching
Total Pages : 42
Release :
ISBN-10 : UOM:39015022805868
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 (68 Downloads)

Book Synopsis The Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China by : China

Download or read book The Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China written by China and published by Better English Language Teaching. This book was released on 1982 with total page 42 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


The Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China Related Books

The Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China
Language: en
Pages: 42
Authors: China
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 1982 - Publisher: Better English Language Teaching

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Marriage, Law and Gender in Revolutionary China
Language: en
Pages: 347
Authors: Xiaoping Cong
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-08-22 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Explores the social and cultural significance of Chinese communist legal practice in constructing marriage and gender relations in the turbulent period from 194
Women, Family and the Chinese Socialist State, 1950-2010
Language: en
Pages: 321
Authors: Xiaofei Kang
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019-11-11 - Publisher: BRILL

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This volume includes 14 articles translated from the leading academic history journal in China, Historical Studies of Contemporary China (Dangdai Zhongguo shi y
Law in the People's Republic of China
Language: en
Pages: 1108
Authors: Ralph Haughwout Folsom
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 1989-01-01 - Publisher: BRILL

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China
Language: en
Pages: 477
Authors: Durham Law School
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-10-18 - Publisher: BRILL

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This contribution provides the important and timely bilingual version of the Chinese Civil Code and the Supreme People’s Court’s Judicial Interpretation of