Download or read book The Theological Anthropology of Theophilus of Antioch written by John W. Reeve and published by . This book was released on 2009 with total page 546 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This study describes the theological anthropology of Theophilus of Antioch focusing on his presentation of the relationship between God and the human, particularly as it relates to immortality, resurrection and judgment. As a protreptic apology, Ad Autolycum, the only extant work of Theophilus, is primarily concerned with turning the reader from a negative to a favorable view of Christianity, from which conversion to belief in the Christian God is a possibility. As such, the work does not present either a system of beliefs or a consistent commentary on the scriptures it addresses. Therefore, the details of Theophilus' theological anthropology must be gleaned from throughout the three books to Autolycus. The main task of this study is to exegete the passages related to immortality, resurrection and judgment to identify the explicit features of each. The features identified do not make a smooth, uniform picture of the human in relation to God, but contains tensions, or logical conflicts. The central tenant of Theophilus' understanding of the relationship between the human and God is the sufficiency of God and the need of the human. As creator, God alone is immortal. As creature, the human is continually dependent upon God for life and breath. Yet the human is created with a great deal of autonomy and freedom. For Theophilus, the human can choose to obey or disobey God and thereby choose between mortality and immortality. Unfortunately, the first human chose to disobey, but God provides repentance, healing and a law to obey for those who turn toward him, and ultimately remakes them in the resurrection to share in his divine character as righteous and immortal. Yet, the resurrection is universal, including those who do not turn toward God. They, who do not receive immortality, do receive a punitive and robust judgment that may be presented as ongoing for eternity. Immortality is conditional, yet mortality may not be an option. The inherent tensions are left ambiguous and not explicitly resolved, which may be, at least partially, on account of the protreptic appeal to God's just retribution. When these features with their tensions are compared with the writings of Tatian and Irenaeus, two of Theophilus' close contemporaries who share a similar anthropology, it becomes evident that similar tensions exist in their views of immortality and resurrection in the context of judgment. Though they address them in different ways, the shared tensions highlight the issues that this generation of Christian writers is facing.